Convicting or Confining--Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill Versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees

Donald H Hermann; Yvonne S. Sor

Convicting or Confining--Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill Versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees

College of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Brigham Young University Law Review
Volume	1983
State	Published - 1983

Disciplines

Law

Access to Document

DonaldHJHermannYvonneSSor.pdfFinal published version, 8.73 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{5ee2b88739a140cd8069e06fc2dcc8d5,

title = "Convicting or Confining--Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill Versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees",

author = "Hermann, {Donald H} and Sor, {Yvonne S.}",

note = "Donald H. J. Hermann; Yvonne S. Sor, Convicting or Confining--Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill Versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees, 1983 BYU L. Rev. 499, 638 (1983)",

year = "1983",

language = "American English",

volume = "1983",

journal = "Brigham Young University Law Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convicting or Confining--Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill Versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees

AU - Hermann, Donald H

AU - Sor, Yvonne S.

N1 - Donald H. J. Hermann; Yvonne S. Sor, Convicting or Confining--Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill Versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees, 1983 BYU L. Rev. 499, 638 (1983)

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

M3 - Article

VL - 1983

JO - Brigham Young University Law Review

JF - Brigham Young University Law Review

ER -