Book Review: Federalism: How Many Critiques Must Historians Write? (Reviewing Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Originalism, Federalism, and the American Constitutional Enterprise: A Historical Inquiry)

Stephen Siegel

Book Review: Federalism: How Many Critiques Must Historians Write? (Reviewing Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Originalism, Federalism, and the American Constitutional Enterprise: A Historical Inquiry)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Tulsa Law Review
Volume	45
State	Published - 2010

Disciplines

Law
Political Science
Public Administration

Cite this

@article{98af1d711f5a4871a200aad9de081344,

title = "Book Review: Federalism: How Many Critiques Must Historians Write? (Reviewing Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Originalism, Federalism, and the American Constitutional Enterprise: A Historical Inquiry)",

author = "Stephen Siegel",

note = "Stephen A. Siegel, How Many Critiques Must Historians Write, 45 Tulsa L. Rev. 823, 830 (2010)",

year = "2010",

language = "American English",

volume = "45",

journal = "Tulsa Law Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Book Review: Federalism: How Many Critiques Must Historians Write? (Reviewing Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Originalism, Federalism, and the American Constitutional Enterprise: A Historical Inquiry)

AU - Siegel, Stephen

N1 - Stephen A. Siegel, How Many Critiques Must Historians Write, 45 Tulsa L. Rev. 823, 830 (2010)

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

UR - https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tlj45&i=837&a=ZGVwYXVsLmVkdQ

M3 - Article

VL - 45

JO - Tulsa Law Review

JF - Tulsa Law Review

ER -

Book Review: Federalism: How Many Critiques Must Historians Write? (Reviewing Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Originalism, Federalism, and the American Constitutional Enterprise: A Historical Inquiry)

Disciplines

Other files and links

Cite this