Are Congressional Committees Constitutional: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, and the Enactment Process

John C. Roberts

Are Congressional Committees Constitutional: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, and the Enactment Process

College of Law

DePaul University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Case Western Reserve Law Review
Volume	52
State	Published - 2001

Disciplines

Law

Access to Document

JohnCRobertsAreCongressio.pdfFinal published version, 5.17 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{eca348f5e7764519b3deb4aae336e42b,

title = "Are Congressional Committees Constitutional: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, and the Enactment Process",

author = "Roberts, \{John C.\}",

note = "John C. Roberts, Are Congressional Committees Constitutional: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, and the Enactment Process, 52 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 489, 572 (2001)",

year = "2001",

language = "American English",

volume = "52",

journal = "Case Western Reserve Law Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Congressional Committees Constitutional: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, and the Enactment Process

AU - Roberts, John C.

N1 - John C. Roberts, Are Congressional Committees Constitutional: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, and the Enactment Process, 52 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 489, 572 (2001)

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

M3 - Article

VL - 52

JO - Case Western Reserve Law Review

JF - Case Western Reserve Law Review

ER -